From 0c521b601d11ce236a98b4e557a0ab0a6d136b1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Dunn Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:38:17 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Config_checks: Missing ! in pin inversion example in Verify endstops In the "Verify endstops" section there is an example of adding an exclamation point to the pin definition to invert its logic. I believe the intention in the example is to keep the hardware pull-up ^ and follow it with ! to invert the pin logic, but the ! is missing. Signed-off-by: Tom Dunn --- docs/Config_checks.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/docs/Config_checks.md b/docs/Config_checks.md index ab65678e..ba4a5015 100644 --- a/docs/Config_checks.md +++ b/docs/Config_checks.md @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ The QUERY_ENDSTOPS command should report the endstop as "TRIGGERED". If the endstop appears inverted (it reports "open" when triggered and vice-versa) then add a "!" to the pin definition (for example, -"endstop_pin: ^PA2"), or remove the "!" if there is already one +"endstop_pin: ^!PA2"), or remove the "!" if there is already one present. If the endstop does not change at all then it generally indicates that